School of the Americas
The Cuban embargo blockade is one of the most famous example of North American
reaction to a small and less economically developed country that practiced its
right to deny foreign intervention and control. As an American, I believe that North Americans are always introduced to history through the biased lens of
nationalism. Students are often introduced to the holocaust, the Rwandan
genocide, and Pearl Harbor to name a few examples, but never bringing to light
the many instances in which North America has been related to, funded, or has been
responsible for events in Latin America that has led to much bloodshed.
The school of the Americas, whose ironic name suggests American
unity, is in truth related to the contrary; violence, oppression, massacre, and
dictatorship are facilitated through the education of this school. Throughout
history, United States has intervened explicitly or implicitly within Latin
American affairs and the school of the Americas is one salient example of North
American influence and abuse of power that is often ignored or unheard
of.
A total of 11 dictators have attended The School of the Americas.
Some of the most infamous graduates from the School of the Americas (SAO) are dictator Efrain
Rios Montt and Argentine dictator Leopoldo Galterieri. Galterieri was
the Dictator and the head of the Death squad Intelligence Battalion during the
“Dirty War” in which 10 to 30 thousand subversives “disappeared”. Efrain
Rios Montt is known for the charge of indigenous genocide by the United Nations,
which devastated the Mayan people during his reign. In effort to debilitate
guerilla support, Montt deliberately killed indigenous communities because he
believed they were supportive of the guerrillistas resulting in the destruction
of nearly 600 villages. Montt’s campaign against the indigenous resulted in
10,000 of indigenous deaths and it is estimated 100,000 indigenous displaced.
Graduates and military officers who have attended the School
of the Americas uphold the notorious reputation of massacre and abuse of human
rights throughout Central and South America. Most of the Dictators have been
supported by United States depending on what financial interest and investments
were involved. In the case of Montt, his effort to stop the rebels was in
effort to stop “the spread of communism” which was easily labeled onto
countries whose goals were to improve conditions of the workers and
nationalization of natural resources during the paranoid era of the cold war.
There are numerous
examples in which North American relations with Latin America have resulted in
the overthrow of government and implementation of dictatorships. American
investments in Latin American countries have led to inhumane working conditions
and monopolization of land resulting in poverty of and decline in the self-sustained
agricultural cultures. American companies have a history of editing financial
information in order to pay a percentage of taxes that is required of them in
an already lenient agreement. And last but not least if American investment has
ever been threatened by a government agent in a Latin American country, the
United States has been quick to supply arms and collaborate in an attack of
state.
I wonder if the
history of US intervention south of the boarder isn’t typically taught in
history classes because of the big debate on immigration laws. If more
Americans knew that part of history maybe they would understand the immigrant’s
plight more clearly.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/nov/18/us-military-usa
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Terrorism/SOA.html
Nice article, I think you would like this documentary if you haven't seen it already: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeHzc1h8k7o
ReplyDelete